Letters To The Editor
Too many forget what sport is about
There must have been some consternation at The Echo last week in trying to
determine the most appropriate place to publish the letter from Jeff Edwards (Echo,
Aug 18).
This fine piece of literary excellence, with its array of legal comment, humour,
technical description and pathos, should have been entered in the recent Writer's
Festival in the "whodunnit?" section, rather than simply making a brief
appearance in the Letters to the editor. There was even a tricky misuse of the
word metre although no doubt, a subtle ploy to keep us less discerning readers,
on our toes.
As a father of two young soccer officials, I was of course alarmed to be made
aware of the extremely sinister organisation that my sons are involved with. Perhaps
they were also responsible for the Kennedy assassination.
It seems that, here I was, thinking that each week they have been venturing
off, sometimes travelling many kilometres and being away all day, for the purpose
of officiating at a sporting event. At least that's what I thought was going on.
Maybe I should have been taking more notice of the constant harassment, personal
insults, foul language and unending criticism that local soccer officials are
copping these days, which in most environments is known as abuse! Was I too thinking
that the "few bucks" that they get paid was due recompense for the shabby,
gutless accusations made to them on a regular basis? Maybe it is acceptable that
kids as young as 14 should have to cope with the ramblings of old frustrated players
and a few loud mouth supporters?
It seems that we will always have a minority of individuals who have little
concept of the term "sportsmanship" and will always direct their inappropriate
behaviour in a manner that simply cannot be considered rational by those of us
that truly do understand what sport is really meant to be about.
Steve Mackney
Lismore
|
|

Club wronged
I was angered and offended by the articles concerning the game called off because
of poor lighting involving Tintenbar-East Ballina Soccer Club
(Echo, Aug 18, Pages one, five, and 24).
I was a supporter at the aforementioned soccer match and I would like to clarify
a few things.
Firstly, the goalkeeper, Scott Stelzer, who plays for fourth division, not
over-35s as stated, was the man who claimed the lighting was insufficient. He
was concerned for his safety, the safety of his teammates, and the safety of Byron
Bay. I don't know where your reporters get their information, but Scott did not
once mention that he was going to sue anyone, let alone the referee. He spoke
to the referee, Keith Barnes, and said "If anyone gets injured, it'll be
on your head."
This statement has been taken totally out of context and provided to your
paper, who in turn has called Scott a "tort law terrorist", when all
he was trying to do was prevent anybody from being hurt, and the referees being
blamed for not making the decision themselves.
Secondly, the paper has stated that Tintenbar-East Ballina fourth division
were at threat of losing the lead in this division by losing to Byron Bay,
making our club look like petty and poor sports. Again, I do not know where you
get your information from, but maybe a little research would go a long way. Tintenbar
have been coming second for practically the entire season, whereas Byron were
running at about sixth place, making the game in question no threat whatsoever
to either team losing the competition lead. The second goal for Byron Bay was
scored in the second half under the poor light conditions.
This article is not a big deal. It is not a big story, and I'm sure it is of
little interest to many. But it has seriously offended me and my clubmates, as
Tintenbar-East Ballina is a good, fun, family club, and we don't need people thinking
otherwise. It has also offended me because practically the whole story is complete
with lies and exaggerations, and I think an apology is in order.
It makes me worry what other trash I read in your, and other newspapers, when
I don't know the full story as I do in this circumstance.
Stacey Titley
- The Echo unreservedly apologises to the Tintenbar-East Ballina Soccer Club's
over 35s and fourth division teams for any implication that the teams were poor
sports. We deeply regret the error. However, The Echo stands by the core claim
of the story - that referees were left feeling they had been threatened with legal
action. - Editor.

Open letter to Lismore Council
I appreciate Council's prompt response to my inquiries regarding the demise
of the fig tree on Invercauld Road (investigations ongoing) and the breakdown
of expenditure in the pamphlet "Your rates at work" under the heading
Enforcement and Street Lighting.
I mistakenly understood that expenditure of $29 to represent millions, but
what it represents is $29 from an estimated average residential rate of $699 for
2002/2003.
I cannot correlate the 'average' figure of $699 for 2002/2003 with my rates
for that period, which were $1,480.65. How was that average figure arrived
at? Even in 1995/1996, my rates were $923.85, well above the average of seven
years later.
Also, "Your rates at work" lists 23 classifications of expenditure,
but I could not interpret any as including monies spent on litigation. The 23
items all have a rate of costs, which add up to $699 in total.
Please identify which item includes litigation costs, and the amount incurred.
Germano Pagura
Goonellabah

War remembered
On behalf of the Evans Head Memorial Aerodrome Committee Inc. and Evans Head
Flying Fun Group, I would like to thank all those people who attended and supported
the 60th Anniversary VP Day memorial celebration at the Aerodrome on Sunday, August
14. Over 350 people came from far and wide to remember.
The Evans Head Memorial Aerodrome played a very significant role in WWII as
part of the largest RAAF training facility built in Australia under the Empire
Air Training Scheme (fondly remembered as EATS) established in Australia, Canada
and Rhodesia to train much-needed personnel for the Allied Command. The No. 1
Bombing and Gunnery School (BAGS) and the No. 1 Air Observers School (AOS) trained
an estimated 6000 men, who served in both Europe and the Pacific wars, mainly
in bomber squadrons.
Of those men who trained at Evans Head, approximately 20 per cent were killed.
This also represents 10 per cent of all Australian RAAF personnel killed during
WWII. The Aerodrome itself is still largely as it was left after most of the buildings
were removed immediately after the war. It is for all these reasons that the entire
Aerodrome was listed on the NSW Heritage Register in 2002.
Veterans from the Base, locals, pilots and friends of the Aerodrome joined
together to commemorate and celebrate the remarkable achievement and sacrifice
of all those who served, worked, supported and trained at No. 1 BAGS and No. 1
AOS during the war and for those who paid the ultimate sacrifice.
To commemorate the fallen, hundreds of small Australian flags were planted
in the ground next to the last remaining WWII Bellman Hangar, as well as a flag
raising by RAAF personnel from the Bombing Range, a wreath laying and flypast
by local pilots which brought a number of veterans close to tears. To celebrate,
there were refreshments, a great display by the Evans Head Living Museum, people
'dressed up' in WWII uniforms from the Base, stories told and a re-enactment of
the 'famous' August 15 1945 Evans Head truck ride by members of the Village Players.
The truck, piano, pianist and page turner from the Ballina area donated their
time to help us out and to carry them round to sing and entertain. About 28 aircraft
flew in from as far afield as Maitland, with a Ryan Trainer taking pride of place.
These aircraft were used at the Base during the war.
There was to be a transport aircraft for flights and a WWII Avenger Torpedo
Bomber but unfortunately the weather was against them and they couldn't make it.
We are sorry they couldn't and also to those who were looking forward to seeing
them, there will be another time.
So thank you all again for making this 60th Anniversary VP Day celebration
so memorable, especially for those veterans who were able to attend. Lest We Forget.
Gai Taylor
Hon Sec, EH MAC
Lismore

Sell out
In the October 2004 elections the Greens obtained 7.2 per cent of the primary
vote and ended up with zero seats. The Nationals got 5.9 per cent of the primary
vote and finished with 12 seats. This of course is how the system works in Australia.
We rely on preferential voting. Statistics can tell different stories. After nine
years of Coalition government, 70 per cent of Australians still don't want Telstra
sold off; 80 per cent of Queenslanders don't want it sold and a country/city comparison
would probably show that less than 20 per cent of country people want private
ownership.
But do these statistics matter to Howard and his bunch of obedient, self-serving
colleagues? Not one little bit. In the recent foray with Barnaby Joyce, Howard
was forced into the position where he had to remind his troops that the ultimate
loyalty of his members must be to the party. But Howard really meant loyalty to
him, not the party and certainly not the Australian people.
Putting this aside, we have the deplorable saga of threats, lies and cajoling,
all to achieve what? For Australians, who were foolish enough to invest in Telstra
shares, they find they are now worth about 35 per cent less than what they were
initially bought for. When has the Government ever put forward any convincing,
logical, fact-based argument for the sale of Telstra? No once, not even from the
treacherous Labor opposition, has there been a disciplined argument put for maintaining
Telstra in government control. Telstra should never ever have been considered
for sale. Australians were all equal shareholders. It is a fundamental functioning
part of the Australian governmental infrastructure. Under the Australian Constitution,
Chapter I. Part V - Powers of the Parliament, Section 51: The Parliament shall,
subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and
good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: - (v) Postal, telegraphic,
telephonic, and other like services. Nothing is more clear. The government is
violating the Constitution, and one of its most essential powers. Once Telstra
is sold off it will effectively lose control and its powers to regulate telecommunication
services in Australia. Howard is determined to flog off Telstra at any cost. Telstra
is already being run by a non-Australian.
Sol Trujillo is presently pushing for less regulation. Once it has been privatised
no amount of money will protect or ensure services. The principle of "commerce
in confidence" will kick in, meaning that as a private enterprise, the corporation
does not have to reveal its business decisions to the public. Also, once it becomes
a full public company it can be sold off to anyone. The government will say they
can maintain control and regulation through the licensing conditions for the various
telecoms to operate within. Sure, but there will be a limited control, as
effectively these companies can do what they like. Look at the banks and how they
have been "de-regulated." The other major argument against the
sale of Telstra is purely common sense. What of the most important protection
of our national interest. A country must ensure the efficient operations
of its communication systems for reasons of domestic civility, commerce, national
border security and ability to respond in cases of natural disaster or war.
Let's face it. The Libs consider everything is a business. Telstra is no different.
They are selling out Australia.
John Jessup
Lismore

Heartfelt thanks
On behalf of the board of Heartfelt House I would like to thank the community
for getting behind our working bee last Saturday at our new premises in the grounds
of Summerland House With No Steps. The following organisations have been very
generous and literally saved us thousands. G James Glass Lismore, Summercraft
Northern Rivers, Alstonville Garden Centre, Melalueca Garden Supplies, Reece Plumbing
Supplies Lismore, Bunnings Lismore, Hurfords Lismore and Ballina, Richmond River
Waste, the Summerland House With No Steps Nursery, Ted Mueller Plumbing, Dale
Smith Concrete Rendering, Alstyle Cabinets, Bilo Alstonville, Superior Steel Lattice
Ballina, Kmart Ballina, Wollongbar Hire, and Lions and Apex Alstonville.
A huge heartfelt thanks to all of you who helped out on the day. It warmed
my heart to see the place alive with people all working toward the common goal
of providing a healing place for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. I
personally feel very privileged that so many are willing to give up their own
time to make a dream I have had for quite a while come true.
Thank you also to Terra from The Echo. As a result of the piece you ran we
have reached many survivors and received various offers of help.
Without the support of the community Heartfelt House would not get off the
ground so once again thank you to all, and please know that everyone who has supported
us to date has contributed to the betterment of the life of a survivor.
Many thanks,
Vicki Hamilton
Director Heartfelt House

Extremes on all sides
Disturbingly, at the exact time Islamic leaders were meeting with John Howard,
a senior cleric was issuing a televised edict inciting the murder of a democratically
elected leader.
The August 22 call by US evangelist and political figure Pat Robertson for
the assassination of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez is the sort of unAustralian
extremism we must make sure does not take root here.
The federal Government should investigate all Christian leaders to find out
if they too have ever supported such terrorist activities as US policy towards
Latin America. I'm sure the moderate mainstream ones will understand when we have
to deport the extremists.
Nick Fredman
Lismore

Come in spinners
So Shane Warne has now taken 600 wickets, making him the world's greatest spinner.
Or does it? Admittedly he has sent down two remarkable balls, one to dismiss Gatting,
the other Strauss, but is he the best?
Consider John Howard, the master of 'the wrong-un' - the ball used to believe
something which isn't true. Look at some of the beauties he has sent down.
1. Wrong-un? - "These boat people are monsters who throw their children
into the sea, illegal queue jumpers". Truth: Asylum seekers fleeing regimes
in Iraq and Afghanistan which Howard himself condemns.
2. Wrong-un? - "The war against Iraq was legal as it has ignored UN resolutions.
Truth: If Iraq has ignored UN resolutions the UN, not the US, should decide on
what action to take.
3. Wrong-un - "David Hicks will receive a fair trial." Truth: Not
according to many distinguished legal practitioners.
4. This Wrong-un would rank up there with Warne's ball that bowled Gatting.
"Our involvement in the Iraq War hasn't increased the likelihood of a terrorist
attack on Australia. We have been a terrorist target before the invasion of Iraq."
Yes, we were a target before the invasion, but that doesn't mean our involvement
in that war hasn't increased the threat of a terrorist attack on us. Before 9/11
the only country under threat was the USA. They were attacked in Beirut, Nairobi,
Yemen and Riyadh. When did we come under threat? When Howard backed America. Now
we are obliged to spend enormous amounts to secure ourselves against attack, money
which could be used to improve our health and education systems.
I suspect he is sending down wrong-uns on unemployment too. We are never told
how many hours someone works a week before he is said to be employed or what he
earns. We are probably facing a wrong-un over the Industrial Relations Bill too.
Let's hope by next election people have learnt how to pick Howard's wrong-uns
and hit him for six so we can return to living in a caring democracy instead of
the present Clayton's.
L Clarke
Ballina

Sugar to blame
Personally, I think that whether science and medicine say yay or nay about
fluoride is not the point. To me, what's important is the fact that I personally
don't tolerate fluoridation. Chlorination is bad enough, and I'd be right royally
peeved if some nitwit fluoridated my water supply without my permission. Whether
my reasons are scientifically proven is inconsequential; I wasn't born to worship
science.
I'm 27 and was born and raised in Tamworth, which to my knowledge is still
unfluoridated thankfully. During this time I've had a good number of carries and
cavities filled in, with a number still floating around - I'll go to a dentist
again only when I really have to! Oddly enough in those days I used A.D.A approved,
leading brand conventional fluoride toothpaste. I'd hazard a guess that the modern
bad diet of sugary junk food/soft drinks, and, at times, lax teeth cleaning regime
helped things along a bit! My mother was actually born and raised in this area,
Old Bonalbo, and would have gotten her full set of false teeth in her early thirties.
This could be related to lack of fluoride, you never know? Either which way tough
bickies - you're here to be ruled by nature, not live to 150 without an itch,
scratch or bout of the common cold.
On a final note (thankfully!), the authorities could put a lot more resources
into household water conservation and storage - especially water tanks. I'll take
non-chlorinated, non-fluoridated rainwater over town anyday! (Until certain parties
in their "wisdom" feel they have a right to chlorinate/fluoridate those!)
Maybe the golden oldies on council would like to help all the anti-fluoriders
purchase water filters that can actually remove the fluoride, huh?
Grant Adams
Lismore
P.S. If people really want to put fluoride in their teeth they should just
go and buy some fluoride toothpaste.

Sounds familiar
So here we go again. Dr Andrew Binns and John Irving, project manager of oral
health (Echo letters, Aug 11) are beating the drums for fluoride to be added to
our water.
Well we have had about 15 years since the last debate and nothing has changed.
The same people are on the fluoride side and the rest of us against.
Has anyone thought about the coincidence of obesity in our young folk and the
fact that few of them drink much water as well as eating a large amount of junk
food?
Perhaps it would be a good idea to add the fluoride to something the young
ones consume and leave the people who don't want fluoride in any of their food
or drink.
We already have aluminium courtesy of our water filtration.
Also, if you brush your teeth and use a fluoride added toothpaste you get enough
of the undesirable stuff.
So why not encourage our youngsters to eat the right food and clean their teeth
after every meal.
Too hard, say the fluoride crowd, let's get everyone where they can't dodge
it and to hell with those who would like to drink pure water only.
It is only a few weeks since I threw out a folder of information from the last
debate.
I felt sure we would be safe from that, but no, the fluoride guys must be going
through my garbage.
Ros Irwin must be congratulated for following up on this.
It's easy to see why oral health want it in the water.
And our government will not fund a dental program so maybe they are in favour
of it, who knows.
We all should know by now how governments get us into more strife than we bargain
for, not to mention broken promises.
Enough for now, wake up Lismore.
RJ Lemon
Lismore

|